Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Base de datos
Tópicos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
HEC Forum ; 33(1-2): 73-90, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1083437

RESUMEN

The Covid-19 pandemic has presented major challenges to society, exposing preexisting ethical weaknesses in the modern social fabric's ability to respond. Distrust in government and a lessened authority of science to determine facts have both been exacerbated by the polarization and disinformation enhanced by social media. These have impaired society's willingness to comply with and persevere with social distancing, which has been the most powerful initial response to mitigate the pandemic. These preexisting weaknesses also threaten the future acceptance of vaccination and contact tracing, two other tools needed to combat epidemics. Medical ethicists might best help in this situation by promoting truth-telling, encouraging the rational adjudication of facts, providing transparent decision-making and advocating the virtue of cooperation to maximize the common good. Those interventions should be aimed at the social level. The same elements of emphasizing cooperation and beneficence also apply to the design of triage protocols for when resources are overwhelmed. A life-stages approach increases beneficence and reduces harms. Triage should be kept as simple and straightforward as reasonably possible to avoid unwieldly application during a pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Eticistas , Pandemias/prevención & control , Distanciamiento Físico , Rol Profesional , Conducta Cooperativa , Toma de Decisiones/ética , Humanos , Asignación de Recursos/ética , SARS-CoV-2 , Triaje/ética , Revelación de la Verdad/ética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA